Views: 0 Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 2025-06-17 Origin: Site
The Distal Tibial Intramedullary Nail (DTN) is indicated for a variety of tibial conditions, including simple, spiral, comminuted, long oblique, and segmental shaft fractures (particularly of the distal tibia), as well as distal tibial metaphyseal fractures, non-/mal-unions; it may also be employed, often with specialized devices, for managing bone defects or limb length discrepancies (such as lengthening or shortening).
Significant soft tissue damage, high infection rate, long recovery
Risk of knee joint injury, inadequate fixation, prone to malalignment
Minimally invasive approach with retrograde insertion design
Distal tibial fractures are a common type of lower limb fracture. Traditional treatments such as locking plates and antegrade intramedullary nails each have their drawbacks. Locking plates may cause postoperative infections or soft tissue necrosis, prolonging recovery; although antegrade nails are minimally invasive, they may damage the knee joint, cause pain, and carry risks of inadequate fixation or malalignment, hindering recovery.
A novel treatment option—Distal Tibial Nail (DTN)—offers a new perspective for managing distal tibial fractures with its unique retrograde design.
Fig. 1: DTN retrograde insertion design
The patient is placed in the supine position. Displaced fractures should be reducible manually; if necessary, use reduction forceps to assist before inserting the DTN. If there is an accompanying fibular fracture, proper fibular alignment can aid tibial reduction.
Key Considerations: Supine position, use reduction forceps if needed. Prioritize fibular fracture management to ensure accurate tibial reduction.
A 2–3 cm longitudinal incision is made at the tip of the medial malleolus to expose the superficial deltoid ligament. A guide pin is inserted at or slightly medial to the tip of the malleolus, 4–5 mm from the articular surface.
Longitudinal cut at the medial malleolus tip
4–5 mm from the joint surface
Interlocking screws proximally and distally
Fig. 2a: Guide pin insertion
Fig. 2b: Lateral view
Fig. 2c: Reaming process
Immediate ankle joint mobility and foot-to-floor contact
Progress to 50% weight-bearing capacity
While monitoring callus formation and pain
Ankle joint activity starts immediately after surgery
Avoid weight-bearing for 4–6 weeks
Gradual transition to full weight-bearing at 8–12 weeks
Regular radiographic monitoring during recovery phase
A study followed 10 patients. By 3 months post-op, 7 cases had healed; all patients achieved healing within 6 months. One case each of varus and recurvatum deformities occurred. No loss of reduction, infection, implant-related complications, or iatrogenic injuries were observed.
Healed within 3 months
Healed by 6 months
Infections
Outcome Measure | DTN Results | Traditional Methods |
---|---|---|
Union Rate (3 months) | 70% | 40-60% |
Malalignment (>5°) | 20% | 25-40% |
Infection Rate | 0% | 5-15% |
AOFAS Score | 92.6 | 73-88 |
Fracture type: Transverse tibial fracture + fibular fracture
Complication: Soft tissue crush injury
Post-op: Only 6 small incisions, complete healing within 1 year
DTN implanted through minimal incisions with excellent soft tissue preservation. Fibular fracture stabilized with intramedullary nail. Patient achieved full recovery with no complications.
Pre-op Imaging
Immediate Post-op
3-month Follow-up
1-year Healing
Retrograde nails have superior axial and rotational stiffness compared to medial locking plates and antegrade nails. Greenfield et al. conducted biomechanical testing showing that using two distal screws in the DTN achieved 60–70% of the compressive stiffness and 90% of the torsional stiffness compared to three screws.
Compared to locking plates, intramedullary nails cause less soft tissue damage, particularly suitable for elderly patients and those with severe soft tissue injuries from high-energy trauma. The procedure does not require knee flexion, reducing the risk of reduction loss and making it suitable for patients with limited knee motion.
The nonunion and malalignment rates for antegrade nails are 0–25% and 8.3–50%, respectively; for locking plates, 0–17% and 0–17%. In this study, all cases achieved union, and only 20% had deformity >5°, comparable to traditional methods.
In summary, DTN offers advantages over locking plates and antegrade intramedullary nails and represents an effective solution for treating distal tibial fractures. DTN features minimal invasiveness, high stability, and rapid recovery. It is a valuable alternative to traditional treatments and worth promoting.
Yamakawa Y, Uehara T, Shigemoto K, et al. Preliminary results of stabilization of far distal tibia fractures with the distal tibial nail: a prospective, multicenter case series study[J]. Injury, 2024: 111634.
创伤骨科智能科技 智汇骨. (2024年12月31日). 胫骨远端髓内钉突破胫骨远端骨折的治疗 [微信公众号文章]. 创伤骨科智能科技 智汇骨. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/9UqQvJ0eAe4bKZg2U4nQ8Q (Accessed: 2025年06月07日)
Top 10 Distal Tibial Intramedullary Nails (DTN) in North America for January 2025
Top10 Manufacturers in The America: Distal Humerus Locking Plates ( May 2025 )
Distal Tibial Nail: A Breakthrough in The Treatment of Distal Tibial Fractures
The Clinical and Commercial Synergy of the Proximal Tibial Lateral Locking Plate
Technical Outline for Plate Fixation of Distal Humerus Fractures
Top5 Manufacturers in the Middle East: Distal Humerus Locking Plates ( May 2025 )
Top6 Manufacturers in the Europe: Distal Humerus Locking Plates ( May 2025 )
Top7 Manufacturers in the Africa: Distal Humerus Locking Plates ( May 2025 )
Top8 Manufacturers in the Oceania: Distal Humerus Locking Plates ( May 2025 )
Top9 Manufacturers in the America: Distal Humerus Locking Plates ( May 2025 )