Views: 35 Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 2022-09-07 Origin: Site
A cemented prosthesis is a widely used orthopedic implant fixation method in joint replacement surgery. Instead of relying on biological bone ingrowth, the implant is stabilized using bone cement—most commonly polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)—to achieve immediate mechanical fixation between the prosthesis and the host bone.
This fixation strategy has been clinically validated for decades and remains a reliable option in modern arthroplasty, particularly in patient populations where bone quality limits the effectiveness of press-fit or cementless fixation.

Bone cement does not function as a biological adhesive. Rather, it acts as a load-transferring interface that fills the microscopic gaps between the implant surface and cancellous bone. Through cement interdigitation, stresses are distributed more evenly, reducing micromotion at the implant–bone interface.
This mechanical stability is especially important during the early postoperative period, when immediate fixation supports early mobilization and functional recovery. For a broader understanding of cement behavior and materials, readers often refer to bone cement orthopedic applications in joint replacement systems.
Cemented prostheses are commonly recommended for elderly patients, individuals with osteoporosis, or patients with reduced bone stock. In these cases, achieving reliable biological fixation with cementless implants can be challenging.
Cemented fixation offers predictable stability regardless of bone density, making it a preferred option when immediate fixation and controlled load transfer are required.
In hip arthroplasty, cemented femoral stems are frequently selected for patients who require early weight-bearing or present with compromised femoral bone quality. In knee arthroplasty, cemented tibial components and patellar buttons remain standard practice in many regions worldwide.
These procedures are commonly performed using standardized hip joint replacement prosthesis and knee joint replacement systems, depending on patient anatomy and surgical objectives.

One of the primary advantages of cemented prostheses is immediate fixation stability. Patients can often begin mobilization and rehabilitation earlier compared to cementless systems, which depend on long-term osseointegration.
In patients with suboptimal bone quality, delayed biological fixation may increase the risk of early implant migration, making cemented fixation a safer and more predictable option.
With advances in cementing techniques, long-term survivorship of cemented prostheses has become comparable to cementless systems. However, revision surgery for cemented implants may require additional techniques for cement removal, which should be considered during initial implant selection.
In complex cases, surgeons may rely on dedicated revision joint replacement implants designed to address bone defects and fixation challenges.
Immediate mechanical stability at the time of surgery
Predictable fixation in patients with poor bone quality
Reduced risk of early implant micromotion or migration
Proven long-term clinical outcomes
Despite its advantages, cemented fixation is associated with specific risks, including cement implantation syndrome, thermal effects during polymerization, and increased technical complexity during revision procedures. These risks are significantly reduced when proper cementing protocols and surgical techniques are followed.
Modern cementing techniques play a critical role in optimizing fixation strength and long-term outcomes. Key steps include proper canal preparation, vacuum mixing of bone cement, and controlled cement pressurization to improve penetration into cancellous bone.
These techniques are typically performed using dedicated orthopedic surgical instruments for joint replacement, which help ensure consistency and reproducibility during implantation.
Cemented prostheses remain a reliable and clinically validated solution in joint replacement surgery. When patient-specific factors—such as advanced age, reduced bone quality, or the need for immediate postoperative stability—are present, cemented fixation continues to play a critical role in modern orthopedic practice.
Rather than being replaced by cementless systems, cemented prostheses have evolved alongside advances in surgical technique and implant design, maintaining their relevance in contemporary arthroplasty.
Cemented fixation is often preferred for elderly patients because it provides immediate stability and does not rely on bone ingrowth, which may be limited due to reduced bone density.
With appropriate patient selection and proper surgical technique, cemented prostheses can function effectively for 15–20 years or longer.
Yes. Although revision surgery may be more technically demanding due to cement removal, cemented prostheses can be safely revised using established surgical techniques.
Medical-grade bone cement has been used in orthopedic surgery for decades and has a well-documented safety profile when used according to clinical standards.
Yes. One of the key advantages of cemented fixation is immediate mechanical stability, which often supports earlier mobilization and rehabilitation.
Absolutely. Cemented fixation remains a standard and widely accepted practice in many hip and knee replacement procedures worldwide.
Bone quality, patient age, activity level, anatomical conditions, and surgical objectives all play important roles in determining the most appropriate fixation method.
Yes. Cemented systems are frequently used in revision cases, particularly when bone defects limit the effectiveness of biological fixation.